New Vegas, no contest. Although the gameplay remained very similar to that of Fallout 3, New Vegas introduced some improvements to the game engine and combat. For Fallout 3 on the Xbox 360, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Should I play this first or New Vegas?". Which do you think I should start with? If you're more of the imaginitive type like myself, you can come up with a pretty cool backstory for your characters as well. New Vegas was my first Fallout, though I quickly bought Fallout 3 and have preferred it ever since. Fallout NV has way better writing. Concidering that in Fallout 3 you start as a child and in Fallout New Vegas you start as a young adult. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America). I'd say get both but since you only want one then go for new vegas. They go on sale somewhat often so getting both is also an option. New Vegas is the better game in a lot of ways, so it comes down to whether (assuming you are going to play both), you want to play the better game first or not. Chronilogically speaking, it's set five years before New Vegas. Fallout: New Vegas is fine to start with, but you're missing half the game and its references by not playing Fallout 1 & 2. Thankyou for all the useful information! fallout 3 is better so start there unless you want a more realistic you must eat and drink or die mode in NV, NV has ads on it too. First Fallout ? Almost every line in the game references something from it. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. They go on sale somewhat often so getting both is also an option. I don't know what you mean by 'lightest' but I can guess. They go on sale somewhat often so getting both is also an option. enjoy them, If you are coming from another genre (fps) or games from other companies not related to bethesda then I would recommend you to start with New Vegas, but honestly it doesn't really matters, both games are amazing in their own way, it's just that New Vegas has better story IMO. All rights reserved. While the world of Fallout 3 is more fun to explore, Fallout: New Vegas features superior gameplay mechanics and more engaging missions. cr.hatenablog.com こちらに戦闘システムのグチは長々と書いたが、結論から言えば敵の攻撃力を防ぐに足る防具、それと敵の防御力を上回る攻撃力で固めていく必要がある。敵の四肢を砕き、ダメージを与えて弱らせてから頭を打ち抜くというアクション要素。 It also has alot of eye candy locations and metros to explore. Play Fallout 3 first. The main story has 4 big endings and tons of variations in endings, Telling about the outcome of every bug quest. it doesn't matter as the stories are not connected, or if they are in my hundreds of hours of game play in both games on xbox360 and pc disc and steam I have never made the connection. Personally having played New Vegas first, I don't think I enjoyed 3 as much, as it lacked much of the crafting and narrative choice of New Vegas. The game has way more replay value as in one play through doing everything you'll only see about 50% of the games content as there are so many choices to do quests differebt ways and many different skill checks required. All rights reserved. New Vegas is better for Fallout Gurus like me because it has Themes like the NCR and References from the first two Fallouts SO: Fallout New Vegas, because it has the spurs that Jingle Jangle View entire discussion (15 comments) *Fallout 3 spoilers* Fallout 3's BoS are the good guys instead of only collecting tech at the cost of any amount of lives. Play Fallout 3 first. It's also better as New Vegas is of a much higher quality than that of 3. I'd advise you to ask this on the Fallout 3 forum as well for obvious reasons, but which one I'd recommend starting with comes down to taste. It will allow you to play through both games with the same character, along with the bonus of having the New Vegas features (iron sights, Survival mode, its weapons) in Fallout 3 and vice versa. New Vegas is a much deeper rpg with actual consequences and real choices in quests. Since the series is more about the thrill of exploration than anything else, Fallout 3 can be considered the better Fallout game. Chronilogically speaking, it's set five years before New Vegas. You should start with fo2 or 1 imo but its ok. Neither of them are complicated to learn, but New Vegas is more about role-playing while Fallout 3 is more about exploration. Fallout 3 had an excellent and complex storyline. This game was set 200 years after the nuclear war that devastated the world and thirty years after the events in Fallout 2. Fallout: New Vegasとは 価格：￥8,190 発売日：2010年11月4日 ジャンル：RPG 対応機種： Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 初回特典：ダウンロードデータアイテムパック同梱 予約特典：グラフィックノベル CERO区分：Z (18歳以上 Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts. © Valve Corporation. I think I might try New Vegas first because I want my first experience to be good and don't want to burnt out on FO3 waiting for the good parts that comes in NV. And any tips for that game? Fallout 3 has good customizability, but New Vegas introduced gun customization and bullets variation. Like.i enjoy 76 but it's so buggy and I can't play it a lot of the time. © Valve Corporation. I … You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. If you're more of the imaginitive type like myself, you can come up with a pretty cool backstory for your characters as well. Which should I play first, this or new vegas? Therefore you can witness the evolution of the games. Play Fallout 3 first. これはFallout New Vegas ArchiveInvalidation InvalidatedでDLするbsaでも確認しましたが、やはりこちらの記号が正しいようです。 もしも今、体型変更でお困りの方はSArchiveListの文章のこの部分を変えてみてください。 私はこれで正常に This is very apparent if you're familiar with these games. Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLJ1gyIzg78. Fallout 3 tends to be more of a spectacle experience, and New Vegas … New Vegas made 3 look like Sh*t in my opinion but 3 is better if you want to start from the beginning. Which is more beginner friendly and interesting to play? You'll have a better overall experience. I'm a novel RPG player, so I would prefer to play the lightest game of both. Most importantly, Fallout New Vegas introduced the Hardcore Mode which gives more realism and intensity to the game and makes the survival or our character in the desert a difficult endeavour. Connect Fallout 3 and New Vegas into one game, using the Tale of Two Wastelands mod. Chronilogically speaking, it's set five years before New Vegas. Fallout: New Vegas: Die Story von Fallout 3 beginnt mit Ihrer Geburt, in New Vegas starten Sie in einem Grab. To the other guys. not the same story but quite the same atmosphere and gameplay i would recommend fallout 3 then new vegas that's my vienw on the question . Granted, I do mod it these days, but I beat it five or six times before doing that and I was never bored. I got Fallout 76 and enjoyed it but an friend of mine told me to install the third installment or New Vegas first. I thought it seemed like Skyrim meets XCOM which are both games I love. Fallout 3 - A visual novel with the illusion of choice. I'd go with Fallout 3 first. I think you'll be done with Fallout 3 sooner, but that could just be my experience getting bored of it pretty fast. in 3 you start as a baby in NV your shot in the head so you tell me which is more interesting to play. Concidering that in Fallout 3 you start as a child and in Fallout New Vegas you start as a young adult. I'm playing New Vegas since 2010 and I'm not bored of it yet. Kinda more like a spin off compared to 3. New Vegas was made by the same people that made the original games, and Fallout 3 is made by the people that made the Elder Scrolls games. Was made by Obsidian, not Bethesda. Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts. Especially after all the bad reviews. Come on to mojave and know the fallout style lore and rpg element. Don't really know what you mean by lightest, but i think fallout nv will give you a better rpg experiance, and it has lots of replay value and lots of choices that give different endings and such. Most people come to the conclusion that Fallout NV is the better game. Fallout 3 is more simple than New Vegas and more forgiving in a multitude of ways. If you're more of the imaginitive type like myself, you can come up with a pretty cool backstory for your characters as well. More powerful and varied enemies than in Fallout 3, enjoyable side quests and more choices when completing quests. The presentation of each game is fairly equal, but New Vegas has a few glitches. New Vegas is definitely the more RPG-heavy of the two and stays true to the classic games Fallout 1/2. playing NV first won't ruin anything but new vegas was made to give you more of what fallout 3 started(as far as game type not story). New Vegas is more of an unfunny parody of western and rat pack movies. It's ALL about choice.