Under UC policy, ties to donors are not considered in admissions and staff violation of the policy can result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Due to student demand, selectivity varies among Colleges. New! Under longstanding university policy, student applicants are evaluated based solely on a holistic review of their application. Policies in place at the time of the alleged incident are the ones that may be enforced. Meet the A-G subject course requirements: History: 2 years As part of the UC application process, UC Berkeley and other UC campuses do not ask applicants for transcripts, portfolios, or other supporting documents. Well, it’s one of those terms that gets thrown around a lot, and honestly, it’s pretty vague. ... University of California, Berkeley University of California, Los Angeles Berkeley MET 2025 applicants. Regarding student-athletes and admissions, we made significant changes in fall 2016 (which took effect with the spring 2017 admitted class) when a new compliance director in Intercollegiate Athletics initiated reforms. Communications between campus development staff and admissions are currently prohibited during the application review process. Minimum Requirements. We expect the reported grades, test scores, extracurricular activities, personal insight questions, and additional comments to give us the full picture of a student's experience and aspirations. How Does UC Berkeley Evaluate Applications? The most recent improvements to admission policies followed a UC systemwide internal audit of undergraduate admissions policies at all UC campuses, which concluded in late 2019. These allegations, if true, are unacceptable, especially in our community where excellence, fairness and equity are our core values. For more information, please visit this University of California admissions page. So be sure to take time to fully explain in your application any of these additional areas where you may shine brightly in the holistic review process. by Berkeley’s freshman or transfer admissions criteria, as applicable. The core theory of race-based affirmative action was that inequality is produced and increased overtime when disenfranchised groups are locked out of the opportunities and resources afforded to the white majority. • The context in which the applicant learned and lived, as well as the opportunities Because my essay wasn't anything too fancy it was straight to the point and listed what i wanted exactly. Berkeley just added a 15th factor; two letters of recommendation will be accepted for fall 2015 application cycle. UC student regent advocates for Indigenous... How state courts use disability to remove Native... Stacking the deck: How the GOP works to suppress minority voting, Opt-in to California exposure app to slow the spread of COVID-19, UC Berkeley launches new center for psychedelic science and education, Subscribe to The Berkeleyan, our weekly email newsletter, The latest information on how UC Berkeley is responding to coronavirus. Under UC policy, ties to donors are not considered in admissions and staff violation of the policy can result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. In fact, these programs have increased absolute gains, but a more holistic analysis of disenfranchised groups in comparison to the white majority paints a much dimmer picture. Under longstanding university policy, student applicants are evaluated based solely on a holistic review of their application. What we look for in Berkeley students. More recent improvements include a requirement expanding these policies and protocols to scholarship student-athletes. We are committed to getting to the bottom of this. - UC Berkeley does not consider these during the application review. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! UC Berkeley pioneered the holistic review process at UC (now adapted by most of the UC campuses), enabling us to admit a diverse undergraduate class representing 53 states/commonwealths and 74 countries, with 17% who are first-generation college-going and 65% who receive financial aid. These were separate from the UC audit recommendations and involved, for example, addressing potential unconscious bias among individuals who review student applications. For example, under our new processes, no individual person (including the admissions director) can determine the final outcome of a student application. For example, in 2016, we implemented a policy that requires a coach to demonstrate that non-scholarship recruits were high-performing athletes who would be required to be active, contributing members of the varsity athletic team for a minimum of one academic year. So let me demystify this for you. UC Berkeley pioneered the holistic review process at UC (now adapted by most of the UC campuses), enabling us to admit a diverse undergraduate class representing 53 states/commonwealths and 74 countries, with 17% who are first-generation college-going and 65% who receive financial aid. At Berkeley, we now document more thoroughly how certain admissions decisions are made, and we have added more process oversight. March 2012 edited March 2012 in UC Transfers. “Comprehensive review” refers to the process of evaluating Transfer applications where all academic and personal attributes are considered, but more emphasis is put on academic preparedness for the major. Student applicants must provide complete, accurate information and their own work. Some may say that the review is subjective but subjectivity is reduced by multiple reviewers looking at an application. If you need to reach us, please submit an inquiry online by going to Contact Us. And, under the leadership of a new undergraduate admissions director, who joined Berkeley in January 2019, additional controls were added.