– Martin Jay, Scopic Regimes of Modernity, p. 19. Apart from a handful of studies, however, of which Virilio’s War and cinema is probably the best known, little systematic attention has been given to the ways in which the conduct of modern wars is mediated by scopic regimes. The term was first coined by Christian Me… Martin Jay, “Scopic Regimes of Modernity” “The modern era, it is often alleged, has been dominated by the sense of sight in a way that set it apart from its premodern predecessors and possibly its postmodern successor. In his text ‘Scopic Regimes of Modernity’ Martin Jay draws our attention to scopic order in the modern era, which is an area with many conflicting views that are not often in alignment with each other. In Martin Jay’s “Scopic Regimes of Modernity”, the author discusses three types of visual representation, or what he calls “scopic regimes”. a research on past scopic regimes – for example, the ‘scopic regimes of modernity’ described by Martin Jay? 8 This blind spot has become ever more acute, because many of the Both Scopic Regimes proposed by Martin Jay encapsulate many key elements of Renaissance and Baroque artworks while taking into consideration the wider political landscape in relation to the art world. Mar 10, 2015 - Professor Martin Jay's lecture was based on a work in progress, The Scopic Regime of Modernity Revisited, where he returns to some of his previous ideas in order to ask what we can now say, twenty years later, about the concept of “scopic regime” as a critical tool of analysis. Any ideas on why or what this passage means? Don’t feel like you have to read the whole ramble – it’s a complete mess! Professor O’Gormann pointed this out as a significant passage in his lecture. I’m going to throw some ideas that I had and some questions I’ve been struggling with. Can a genealogical approach help us un-derstand the role of vision in contemporary culture, detect the emergence of new forms of spectatorship, isolate the current scopic regimes … In this context, the term land-scopic regimes derives directly from Martin Jay’s (1988) identification of the “scopic regimes of modernity” (“descriptive,” “baroque,” and “Cartesian perspectivalism”) and is proposed here as supplemental to, and co-existent with, the more familiar operation of Cartesian representational modes. modernity.