To further confuse matters, the C 3000 B was relaunched in 2012 as the “C3000;” see sidebar links for details. The person that had me come out and set up, had a pair of these, some C1000's, and some 58's and 57's. What needs to be said is that since these were my first, and since almost all of m meaningful experience with LDCs follow them, I may actually lack the language to describe them adequately, even though their sound is forever stuck in my head. Small diaphragms, but accurate and cheap. If you are trying to record in the studio, make sure you turn off supercardioid mode. A sound investment for every studio The C3000 high-performance, large-diaphragm condenser microphone has been a standard for live applications and studio recording for almost two decades. If you try and use it for vocals without a treated room, you will wrestle trying to focus on the subject. Unfortunately AKG has supremely confused matters by not changing the name. Three recessed switches on the rear of the mic … if you're looking for a budget microphone, maybe you don't want to spend a couple of grand for the 'classics', then this is one to go with. IMO a worthwhile investment for a budget all round LDC if you havent got money to splash on lots of mics. Not pleasing at all. Cardioid Not really a beauty. Black housing. Very one dimensional and thin. The ones I had came with swivel mounts, but the optional AKG H100 universal shockmount works quite well with this microphone. The original C 3000 was released in 1993. The neighbours kids or a persistant door salesman... So, this collection of reviews needs to be split into at least one more category, and all previous reviews should be clarified. I have a couple of these, and have had them for some time. These were my first pair of LDCs --both gone now, which will tell some of the story though not necessarily all of it. Ease of use and sound; The placement of the microphone is fairly simple. I first used a pair of these on a budget choir / ensemble gig, where I was not the one providing the equipment. The C 3000 was a unique dual-capsule condenser microphone. アマチュアでも最初の一本として手を出し易いコンデンサーマイク2本、 AKG社 C3000 RODE社 NT2-A どちらを買おうか迷っている方も多くいるかと思います。 今日はそんな方のために、主観全開の評価をまとめてみた … That said, I find it a lot better mic than others have suggested here. On a technical level, the mic is adequately quiet for close-miked applications, with an equivalent input noise (IEN) of 21dBA, and its sensitivity is broadly comparable with other microphones of a similar type. Especially on trumpets, I chose the C3000 recording, from a Rode NTK recording, a mic I had at that time against the AKG. There is to my ears something boxy going on in the mids, though. Firstly the cons Not the most attractive mic out there, or the best. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. It has a decent build quality, comes in an excellent case, pad and rolloff and dual pattern (cardioid and hyper). It's cheap, and it is a fizzy, ear piercing piece of crap. I never liked it on bassy stuff, low male voices or low-note instruments, but when it had to record trumpets and girls, it proved OK. I do not regret them--pretty good deal, usable on a variety of source. Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2014 This is an exceptionally well-rounded microphone. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. So I bought a pair of silver C3000. Hi folks, Time for another gear review. The versatility of the microphone makes it a fine choice for the variable recording applications that may be presented in a studio environment. The AKG Acoustics C 3000 is also known as: C3000. First listen to the C1 by comparison was like pulling the proverbial cotton out, but not in a way that I ultimately came to appreciate much either...sigh. In short, if you see one for cheap, I think it can certainly rival other mics that cost about the same, or more, and it is worth having one or two around. Where these really excel is they have a supercardioid mode. The placement of the microphone is fairly simple. The AKG C3000 is a quite small condeser microphone. If they take too much SPL, or abuse of other types, they can be replaced, no love lost. The C 3000 was a unique dual-capsule condenser microphone. The original C 3000 was very different than the other three versions. So it was with this mic. I also don't like using it for male vocals, not really sure why but the top end just sounds plain wrong, whereas it seems to complement female vox better. I tried the C3000 on different sources. al. And scratchy. The original model can be identified by the ability to switch between cardioid and hypercardioid with a switch on the back of the mic. It's the same idea as a figure 8 pattern, but in this case it makes the mic extra directional. They are not bad recording mics, but for a little bit more money, you can get a condenser that is a fair amount better. Initial impressions; It is black and has a logo that looks like multiple pickup patterns. I am afraid to say that to my ears it had a boxiness that I could never quite dial out and that during YEARS of continuous use I learned to ID very quickly in my recordings, in the same way one learns to hear the unfortunate peculiarities of one's recording room over years of repetition--you can hear when you bounce a note off an unfortunately placed window. No, of course not. The AKG C 3000 B out performs studio condensors that are considerably more expensive.